Theorem
Equivalent Categories kG-Mod & Rep G
Group Representation
The category of $kG$-modules and the category of representations over a group $G$ $Rep_k (G)$ are equivalent.
Proof
Let $G$ be a group and $k$ a field.
\medskip
Step 1: From representations to $kG$-modules.
Let $\rho : G \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ be a representation of $G$ over $k$.
We define a $kG$-module structure on $V$ as follows.
Recall that $kG$ consists of finite sums $\sum_{g \in G} a_g g$ with $a_g \in k$.
For $v \in V$, define
$$
\left( \sum_{g \in G} a_g g \right)\cdot v
\;:=\;
\sum_{g \in G} a_g \, \rho(g)(v).
$$
We verify this defines a $kG$-module structure.
Linearity in $v$ and in the coefficients $a_g$ is immediate from linearity of each $\rho(g)$.
For multiplicativity, let
$$
x = \sum_g a_g g,
\qquad
y = \sum_h b_h h.
$$
Then
$$
xy = \sum_{g,h} a_g b_h \, gh.
$$
Hence
$$
(xy) \cdot v
=
\sum_{g,h} a_g b_h \, \rho(gh)(v)
$$
$$
=
\sum_{g,h} a_g b_h \, \rho(g)\rho(h)(v)
$$
$$
=
\sum_g a_g \rho(g)\!\left( \sum_h b_h \rho(h)(v) \right) \\
=
x \cdot (y \cdot v).
$$
Thus $V$ becomes a left $kG$-module.
Step 2: From $kG$-modules to representations.
Conversely, let $V$ be a $kG$-module.
For $g \in G$, define
$$
\rho(g) : V \to V
\qquad by \qquad
\rho(g)(v) := g \cdot v.
$$
Since the $kG$-action is $k$-linear, each $\rho(g)$ is a $k$-linear map.
We check that $\rho$ is a group homomorphism. For $g,h \in G$,
$$
\rho(g)\rho(h)(v)
=
g \cdot (h \cdot v)
=
(gh) \cdot v
=
\rho(gh)(v),
$$
where the middle equality uses associativity of the module action. Also,
$$
\rho(1)(v) = 1 \cdot v = v.
$$
Thus $\rho : G \to \operatorname{GL}(V)$ is a representation.
Step 3: The constructions are inverse to each other.
Starting with a representation $\rho$, constructing the associated $kG$-module, and then restricting the action back to $G$, clearly recovers the original $\rho$.
Conversely, starting with a $kG$-module $V$, defining $\rho(g)=g\cdot$, and then extending linearly to $kG$, recovers the original module structure.
Thus the two constructions are mutually inverse.
Therefore there is a one-to-one correspondence between representations of $G$ over $k$ and left $kG$-modules.
Depends on
Dependency Graph
flowchart LR
classDef current fill:#6366f1,color:#fff,stroke:#4f46e5
nca6bd350["Representation"]
nb23c4395["Equivalent Categories kG-Mod & Rep G"]:::current
nca6bd350 --> nb23c4395
click nca6bd350 "../objects/ca6bd350.html" "_self"